TFTHE FILMREVIEW · 50K FRESH TAKES
There's Something Wrong with Ray — poster
← ALL FRESH TAKES

SOURCE-LED EDITORIAL REVIEW

There's Something Wrong with Ray: choices before the verdict.

There's Something Wrong with Ray · 2019

A source-led reading of There's Something Wrong with Ray as cinematic narrative: choice, decision, documented consensus, and the counterpoint that shifts the conclusion.

THE FILM EDITORIAL DESKAugust 31, 2026310 WORDS
01

THEMATIC CENTER

choice
02

NARRATIVE PRESSURE

decision
03

FORM

cinematic narrative
04

RECORD ANCHORS

avoid · contact · awkwardly

The record for There's Something Wrong with Ray yields three coordinates specific to its premise—avoid, contact, and awkwardly. That vocabulary places choice at the center and gives decision its dominant tension. It establishes a documentary baseline, not a borrowed score; criticism must still ask what the form does with that material.

There's Something Wrong with Ray brings choice into contact with decision through cinematic narrative. That intersection is our Fresh Take: judge the premise less by its familiarity than by how precisely that combination makes its conflict legible. The existing editorial note adds this view: A strong, singular piece of cinema driven by genuine directorial conviction.

There's Something Wrong with Ray (2019) arrives with the coordinates of a cinema film situated in 2010s cinema. The record credits Kurnia Alexander with the direction and places Ajeng Sharfina and Adinda Mustafa in the foreground. With an unusually compact form, the useful question is not to invent an invisible intention, but to notice how these documented choices shape audience expectations before the first frame.

Read as cinematic narrative, the film carries the pressure of decision. The story presents a connected set of decisions whose coherence matters more than their compliance with a familiar formula. The most precise critical test is therefore how one choice alters every option that follows. A quick verdict always simplifies the object it claims to summarize. It is more useful to follow visible choices, their consequences, and the tension they create between familiarity and singularity.

The counterpoint suspends the score long enough to identify the precise choice that continues to resist the verdict. Instead of asking whether the film confirms the expected story of choice, the sharper question is whether it changes the person, place, or institution with the power to define it. The final question becomes less ‘should this be liked?’ than ‘which choice truly organizes the experience?’

THE VERDICT, REFRAMED

Our angle: a singular voice often emerges from tension between familiar elements. Here, choice changes meaning under the pressure of decision.

THE DOCUMENTARY STARTING POINT

Ray may avoid eye contact, not talk much, and move awkwardly, but he's always relatively normal until one day... he isn't, and it's up to his friends to find out what's wrong with him.

Original review by The Film Editorial Desk. No audience testimony or independent critic identity is fabricated.
Year
2019
Runtime
13 min
Direction
Kurnia Alexander
Performers
Ajeng Sharfina · Adinda Mustafa · Andrew Barnabas · Joshua Christopher